Thank you tntlamb :-). I appreciate the information. I must say it’s overwhelming and I’m on a fast learning curve here. I keep getting pushed by loved ones to also seek natural alternatives. Have you come across any research regarding natural alternatives? I’ve talked to a few doctors and most are saying it’s a waste of money…it seems that the pharmaceutical companies run everything including cost of meds. I’m lucky as I have coverage along with my husband so dual coverage is a blessing. I don’t mean to rock the boat but knowing there is no cure…anything is possible and worth a try right? Or maybe not??
tntlamb said:
You got it Tara. It ALL works together. I only mentioned the difference between the low impact stuff and “working out” because a lot of folks figure it takes some massive exercise regime to make a difference when it doesn’t. Just flexing your toes when you have time helps the foot pain immensly.
In terms of drugs there are a couple of things to remember (I design medical studies and review them for living) The bulk of the drugs we use are considered effective if they reduce symptoms by 25% (the biologicals are prime) We cna not distinguish between men and women in drug trials despite massive volumes of data showing distinctly different pain mechanisms.
Although I personally believe the sooner you move to a biological the better, keep in mid there are only 4 or 5 approved for PsA. Most people burn through a drug every few years. Its possible to run out. Afterall the have only been around a dozen or fewer years. there are several on these boards that have done just that.
You slow start isn’t necessarily a bad thing. These studies (which I am somewhat intimate with) are what is defining todays treatment:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21267733
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21044435
Its all about combination therapies now. Humira did a massive post market study and is recommending the addition of MTX. Remicade includes it in their prescribing information (to prevent anitbody formation) etc etc So you are not wasting time or getting less tha treatment than you should. It takes a while to learn how to take MTX. I would NOT hesitate to push for the addition of a Bio though.
TaraLynn said:
Right Tntlamb I understand the difference between therapy and exercise. I will be seeing a physical therapist next week. I commented on my past active life because of the statement that people who do low impact repetitive exercise are listed in the findings you posted as not being impacted by PSA…I simply feel that’s not the case. I do believe that moving and keeping active helps. I’m sorry but when I’m having a bad flare I’m lucky if I can sleep in my own bed and getting to the bathroom takes triple time…it all depends on the severity of the flare. Just my opinion…I also am open to trying different things because as we all know there is no cure, medication is a wonderful thing but food can also heal so that too is worth a try along with being active and so on…thanks
tntlamb said:TaraLyn there is is difference between “exercise” and therapy. I understand what you are saying. I was runner, biker etc too at one time. When i talk about movement its more what you would get from a “good trainer” the old saw of “I’d exercise but it hurts too much” typifies it. No matter what is going on “flare wise” or “pain wise” you can move. Its can be as simple as rolling your foot back and forth on a pop bottle or making a fist and straightening your fingers multiple time. Its probably harder for people who were really active at one point to understand the repetitive motion and stretching thing. You really want to be concentrating on ROM stuff. This DVD is helpful.
Mataribot, I’m not sure what studies you are referring to. DMARDS are effective a third more often than are biologicals. There is not that I am aware of a single study out there that shows any biologic to be equally effective as a monotherapy to a combination with a DMARD (MTX is the standard used in studies)
The statement around here of “get to a biological, they work better” simply is not true. A person in pain simply has a better chance of getting relief more quickly (even if partial) with first a NSAID and then a DMARD) perhaps its medicine by the numbers but pain relief is the first goal, then disease management.
It is unnecessarily discouraging (and flat wrong) to insinuate that anything less than a biological drug is less than appropriate treatment. Hindsite of how great a biological is when it works is great, not so great when you are on your third and still isn’t working. It discouraging enough when a drug regime that works 70% - 80% of the time doesn’t
You might also note the most COMMON complaint around here is hands and feet (besides general yuck and fatigue) Even the Biological manufacturers admit their stuff is pretty ineffective for peripheral systems.

it’s a little frustrating however I’m so grateful to have found this site and connected with you all!!!